Skip to main content

The Indian Economy: Current Performance and Short-Term Prospects

 

I.  Introduction

 

The economic policy in India can often be dictated by political expediency as political parties indulge in competitive populism in the face of improvements in social indicators such as literacy, infant mortality and the like lagging behind rises in the rate of economic growth.

 

II.   The Record of Economic Growth in India

 

By all accounts from the 15th to the 18th century India was one of the most prosperous regions of  the world with plentiful supply of highly advanced commercial and industrial techniques (Clydesdale 2007). From 1700, however, Indian GDP per capita started to drop. India’s colonial experience was not unique since most colonies that did not           result in settlements had poor records of economic growth, even stagnation Table shows levels of GDP per capita in the major European colonial powers and some colonies for about 500 years.

Levels of GDP per capita in European Colonial Powers and Former Colonies, 1500– 1998 (1990 international dollars)

 

 

1500

1700

1820

1913

1950

1998

 

European Colonial Powers

Britain

762

1405

2121

5150

6907

18714

France

727

986

1230

3485

5270

19558

Italy

1100

1100

1117

2564

3502

17759

Netherlands

754

2110

1821

4049

5996

20224

Portugal

632

854

963

1244

2069

12929

Spain

698

900

1063

2255

2397

14227

 

Former Colonies

China

600

600

600

552

439

3117

India

550

550

533

673

619

1746

Indonesia

565

580

612

904

840

3070

Brazil

400

460

646

811

1672

5459

Mexico

425

568

759

1732

2365

6655

United States

526

715

880

2736

3446

18183

Source: Maddison (2006).

 

Thus the colonial experience was impoverishing for several colonies. Currently China’s GDP per capita is  higher than India’s by a factor of almost 3 indicating that since independence India’s advantage over China has disappeared. India’s post-independence growth did not have an auspicious start, although growth has accelerated considerably of late.

In aggregate terms growth appears to have picked up significantly since the 1980s. Further, the variability of this growth (as measured by the standard deviation) has come down significantly. Per capita GDP growth which was 1.2 percent per annum during 1972-82, accelerated to 3.0 percent during 1982-92 and further to 3.9 percent during 1992-2002. In recent times it has accelerated even further. So the Indian economy has been enjoying high and relatively stable rates of growth for more than a quarter century now.

Real GDP growth was at 9.0 per cent in 2005-06 and accelerated to 9.4 per cent in 2006-07. This comes on the back of two good years for GDP growth: 8.5 per cent in 2003-04 and 7.5 per cent in 2004-05. As a consequence of such rapid growth India is now a huge market with a large and young population. As much as 95.1 per cent of India's billion plus population is below the age of 65, with almost a third being younger than 14.


Labor force is keen to enrich itself quickly and to compete with the outside world - witness India's persistent double-digit export growth in recent years. Furthermore, India's growth is likely to be less dependent on global growth than other Asian countries since it does not rely  excessively on manufacturing exports. The service sector accounts for more than 31 per cent of India's exports. Thus any downturn in the global economy may have less impact on India.

One concern attending recent economic growth in India is that since it has been demand led and faces key infrastructural constraints, inflation has picked up. In particular, CPI-AL (the price index most relevant for the poor in India) has risen more rapidly than the wholesale price index or the CPI-IW. The RBI has raised the cost of borrowing successively to rein in inflation. This move seems to be having the desired effect although much will depend on the South West monsoons and the supply situation thereafter.

Factors Accelerating Economic Growth in India

The current high rate of economic growth could well accelerate further as Kelkar (2004) has opined. Contributing to this acceleration is a broad series of reforms including financial sector reforms, increased globalization and widening and deepening of product and financial markets. At the same time a benign FDI policy framework has permitted greater tie-ups in high technology areas for production for domestic as well as external markets.

Productivity Growth

The higher GDP growth rate beginning in the 1980s has been accompanied by an even sharper acceleration in total factor productivity growth. Rodrik and Subramanian (2004) examine a number of possible explanations for this rise in productivity/growth. Such explanations include Keynesian type demand-led expansion in the 1980s, the advent of the Green Revolution, and possible external and internal liberalization. Such beneficial synergies were helped by the climate of deregulation and delicensing started in the early 1990s.

Table 6 documents the acceleration in total factor productivity growth in India.

Table 6: Sources of Growth in India: Aggregate and by Major sectors (percent per year)

 

Aggregate Economy

 

 

 

 

Contribution of

Period

Output

Employment

Output per worker

Physical capital

Land

Education

Factor productivity

1978-04

5.4

2.0

3.3

1.3

0.0

0.4

1.6

1978-93

4.5

2.1

2.4

1.0

-0.1

0.3

1.1

1993-04

6.5

1.9

4.6

1.8

0.0

0.4

2.3

Agriculture

1978-04

2.5

1.1

1.4

0.4

-0.1

0.3

0.8

1978-93

2.7

1.4

1.3

0.2

-0.1

0.2

1.0

1993-04

2.2

0.7

1.5

0.7

-0.1

0.3

0.5

Industry

1978-04

5.9

3.4

2.5

1.5

 

0.3

0.6

1978-93

5.4

3.3

2.1

1.4

 

0.4

0.3

1993-04

6.7

3.6

3.1

1.7

 

0.3

1.1

Services

1978-04

7.2

3.8

3.5

0.6

 

0.4

2.4

1978-93

5.9

3.8

2.1

0.3

 

0.4

1.4

1993-04

9.1

3.7

5.4

1.1

 

0.4

3.9

Source: Bosworth and Collins (2007)

Improvements in Labour Supply     

Adding to the impetus for higher economic growth are certain structural changes occurring in the Indian economy – particularly on the supply side. In 2000 the proportion of the Indian population in the working age group (15-64 age bracket) was 60.9%. The UN’s Population Division has projected that this ratio will surpass the proportion of Japanese in this age group by 2012 and climb to over 66% in 30 years. At that point in time it is poised to overtake China’s population in the same age group. This is a very significant projection.

Higher Savings for Enhanced Economic Growth

Central to the growth success story has been a steady rise in India's saving and investment rates as Table 7 indicates.

Table 7: Savings and Investment in India

 

Savings and Investment (Base: 1999-2000) as per cent of GDP at Current Market Prices

 

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

(estimated)

Gross Domestic Savings, of which

24.8

23.4

23.5

26.4

29.7

31.1

32.4

a) Public

-0.8

-1.9

-2.0

-0.6

1.2

2.4

2.0

b) Private, of which

25.6

25.3

25.5

27.0

28.5

28.7

30.4

i) Household, of which

21.1

21.0

21.8

22.7

23.8

21.6

22.3

Financial

10.6

10.2

10.8

10.3

11.3

10.2

11.7

Physical

10.5

10.8

10.9

12.4

12.4

11.4

10.7

ii) Private corporate

4.5

4.3

3.7

4.2

4.7

7.1

8.1

Gross Domestic Investment, of which

25.9

24.0

22.9

25.2

28.0

31.5

33.8

Public

7.4

6.9

6.9

6.1

6.3

7.1

7.4

Private

17.9

16.5

16.3

18.4

19.4

21.3

23.6

Valuables

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.9

1.3

1.2

Gross Fixed Capital Formation, of which

23.4

22.8

23.0

23.8

24.8

26.3

28.1

Changes in stocks

1.9

0.6

0.2

0.7

0.8

2.0

2.9

Valuables

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.9

1.3

1.2

Saving Investment

-1.1

-0.6

0.6

1.2

1.6

-0.4

-1.3

Public

-8.2

-8.8

-8.9

-6.6

-5.2

-4.7

-5.4

Private

7.7

8.8

9.2

8.6

9.2

7.4

6.9

Source: Economic Survey, Government of India, 2006-07

Table 8: India: Key Fiscal Indicators (per cent of GDP)

Though fiscal deficits have been coming down successive reductions have become harder to achieve. It is not clear whether the FRBMA goal of achieving zero revenue deficit by 2009 will be achieved. In the meantime public debt is nearly 75 per cent of GDP. External debt is low, with a large share in long term debt. Hence pressures on the exchange rate because of high external debt are minimal. In addition India’s foreign exchange rate reserves on 25 May 2007 stood at US$204.9 billion, a substantial part of which comes from sterilization operations to keep the exchange rate competitive for exporters.

 

Year

Primary Deficit

Revenue Deficit

Gross Fiscal Deficit

Outstanding Liabilities (including external liabilities at historic exchange rates)

Centre

2002-03

1.1

4.4

5.9

63.4

2003-04

-0.03

3.6

4.5

62.8

2004-05

-0.04

2.5

4.0

63.8

2005-06

0.4

2.6

4.1

63.4

2006-07 (RE)

0.1

2.0

3.7

61.5

2007-08 (BE)

-0.2

1.5

3.3

59.2

States

2002-03

1.3

2.2

4.2

32.5

2003-04

1.5

2.2

4.5

33.4

2004-05

0.7

1.2

3.5

33.3

2005-06

0.1

0.04

2.4

32.5

2006-07 (RE)

0.4

-0.01

2.6

30.3

2007-08 (BE)

-0.02

-0.4

2.1

29.2

Combined

2002-03

3.1

6.6

9.6

80.7

2003-04

2.1

5.8

8.5

81.4

2004-05

1.4

3.7

7.5

82.4

2005-06

1.0

2.6

6.6

80.5

2006-07 (RE)

0.7

2.0

6.2

77.0

2007-08 (BE)

0.0

1.2

5.3

74.2

RE= Revised Estimates BE= budget estimates

Source: Reserve Bank of India

III.   India’s External Sector 

      Performance Another notable aspect of the recent acceleration in India’s economic growth has been its greater economic integration with the global economy. International trade reforms have proceeded rapidly in India. India is far less dependent on tariffs for government revenue but agricultural tariff reduction has not kept pace with industrial tariff liberalization.

India’s export basket is geared towards high value added items such as engineering goods (Tables 9-12).

Table 9: Growth in Exports (per cent)

 

Region/Country

2004

2005

2006

2007 (Q1)

World

21.2

14.1

15.5

18.5

Industrial Countries

17.3

8.5

12.6

12.9

USA

12.9

10.8

9.7

9.4

Germany

21.3

7.3

15.1

20.8

Japan

19.9

5.2

9.2

5.4

Developing Countries

27.3

22.1

19.2

25.8

China

35.3

28.4

27.2

27.8

India

28.2

29.6

21.5

12.6

Korea

31.0

12.0

14.4

14.6

Singapore

24.6

15.6

18.4

9.9

Malaysia

26.5

12.0

14.0

7.6

Thailand

19.8

14.5

18.7

17.2

Source: IMF (International Financial Statistics) and RBI.

 

 

 

Furthermore, the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) regime has been further liberalized and the World Investment Report 2006 mentions India as among the top 15 recipients of FDI with improved prospects for the intermediate run.

IV.   Illustrations of High Growth and Stagnation in the Indian Economy

The broadening of the base for rapid growth in the Indian economy from service to include industry has meant that there has been rapid growth of incomes. Based on repeated surveys of consumer expenditure at the household level the NCAER has suggested that real incomes are expanding rapidly as Table 13 indicates.

Table 13: Growing Prosperity – All India

Income Figures in Rs. 000 per annum at 2001-02 prices, households in ‘000 numbers

 

 

1995-96

 

2001-02

 

2005-06

 

2009-10

 

<90

 

131,176

 

135,378

 

132,249

 

114,394

 

91-200

 

28,901

 

41,262

 

53,276

 

75,304

 

201-500

 

3,881

 

9,034

 

13,183

 

22,268

 

501-1,000

 

651

 

1,712

 

3,212

 

6,173

 

1,001-2,000

 

189

 

546

 

1,122

 

2,373

 

2,001-5,000

 

63

 

201

 

454

 

1,037

 

5,001-10,000

 

11

 

40

 

103

 

255

 

10,001+

 

5

 

20

 

52

 

141

 

Source: NCAER

The projected consumption boom isn’t just restricted to urban India. On the contrary, the NCAER survey suggests that the urban demand for some relatively low-end products will be saturated by the end of the decade, while rural demand picks up.

This is reflected in higher penetration levels in rural households of almost all major items. Motorcycles are now owned by close to 8 per cent of rural households, compared with about 2 per cent 10 years ago. Over 25 per cent of rural households have TV sets, again about four times as many as a decade ago. Four per cent of rural households have refrigerators, while about 38 per cent have ceiling fans. These penetration levels too are several multiples of their magnitudes of a few years ago.

I now present some evidence of the performance of a high growth sector, automobiles

V.   Emerging Constraints on Rapid Economic Growth in India

 

Although India’s economic growth record has been truly impressive the country does not perform as well on a broader set of human development indicators. It improved only marginally from 0.302 in 1981 to 0.381 in 1991 and 0.472 in 2001. India’s HDI rank in 2002 was 124th – which was a deterioration on the rank (of 115th) attained in the previous year. In 2003 there was further slippage and India was 127th in the global ranking.


i)        Increasing regional inequality

The aggregate economic growth narrative presented above masks substantial spatial variations. The regional variation in economic growth in India has remained stubbornly high despite the reforms.

Figure 4: 

 

 

(ii)   Rising Unemployment

 

An additional emerging constraint on rapid economic growth in India is the inability – at least so far - of the reforms to generate a sufficient number of jobs. India has long had problems with unemployment and underemployment. However, economic growth in the pre-reform period did impact on unemployment by raising the demand for labour. The employment elasticity of output growth was high.

 

In addition to open unemployment there also exists India’s persistent problem of underem- ployment. Underemployment in various segments of the labour force is quite high. The estimates of the 50th Round of the NSS indicate that although open unemployment was only 2 per cent in 1993-94 on US basis, the incidence of under-employment and unemployment taken together was as much as 10 per cent that year.

(iii)   High Fiscal Deficit

India’s fiscal deficit woes have been well documented. The combined fiscal deficit of the central and state governments has been hovering near 10 percent of GDP for quite some time now but has come down in the recent past. This figure was 9.6 percent in 2002-03, 8.5 percent in 2003-04, 8.4 per cent in 2004-05 and is estimated to be 7.5 per cent in 2005-06.

(iv)   Problems of Infrastructure

India’s record in providing high quality, reliable and reasonably priced infrastructural services to its households and businesses has been inadequate. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that this state of affairs will continue for some time. Even though the potential of the private sector to meet India’s pressing infrastructure needs is largely untapped, and hence can be expanded considerably, there will continue to be a major role for the public sector in providing infrastructural services, particularly in the less developed regions/states of India.

VII.   Prospects for alleviating the constraints on rapid economic growth

That rapid economic liberalization of the form that took place in China beginning in the late 1970s is difficult to achieve in India is now clear. In a democratic society tolerance for rapidly increasing inequality and slow realization of gains of liberalization for the poor is low.

Rapid rise in agricultural employment must await substantial investment – particularly in agricultural infrastructure. Employment growth in the      services sector has been impressive but the capacity of this sector to absorb labour is limited. For purposes of employment expansion India will have to rediscover its latent comparative advantage in low value added manufacturing.This has been the area of most rapid growth in China and several Southeast Asian countries. India did not enter this club and imposed high tariffs on these products while at the same time producing these product domestically in “small scale industries”, many of which were granted reservations for producing specific goods. The result has been high cost production which is non-competitive both in the domestic and international markets.

 

After decades of high GDP growth China and Southeast Asia have moved up the value chain  in manufacturing production and India could well occupy the vacated low value added manufacturing space.

 

The one area in which considerable progress can be expected is telecom. Mobile telephone and associated technology has grown rapidly in India. India has in excess of 50 million mobile phones with a rate of growth of 2 million phones a month. Internet access has improved considerably and there are plans to bridge the rural-urban divide in internet connectivity by rapid expansion of services in rural areas.

Some progress has also been achieved in the areas of roads. There is a substantial project to build new highways – including the so-called “golden quadrilateral” to connect the four major cities of New Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai with six lane expressways and supplementary feeder routes.

 

The functioning of ports has also recorded some improvements – partly as a result of contracting out the operations of ports to international firms with specialised expertise on this subject.

 

Thus the prospects for effective alleviation of the constraints facing higher economic growth are mixed but, on balance, they appear positive. However, India must continue to adopt a forward looking economic reforms program to work around some of these constraints and ensure high and stable growth can be put in place.

 

VIII.   Conclusions

 

After two decades of economic reforms the Indian economy is at a crossroads. The reforms program has yielded considerable returns in the form of higher and more stable growth as well as considerable modernization of the economy. After more than two decades of impressive economic growth and some important reforms as well as deregulation, the Indian economy is at the threshold of even higher growth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shale oil is the innovation of 21st century’

Steven Kopits  Horizontal drilling and hydrofracking have revolutionized not only the oil business but also the global economy. They have reduced the price of a barrel of oil by 60 per cent and chopped the US oil trade deficit by US$300 billion per year. Neither horizontal drilling nor fracking were new. Directional drilling goes back to the 1930s, and modern horizontal drilling was practiced more than a quarter century ago. Hydrofracturing wells – fracking – to improve the flow from an oil or gas reservoir has been a standard well completion technique since 1950. Shale production began with gas, as shale oil was considered to be unsuitable for commercial extraction. With natural gas in the US typically selling at $7.00 per million British Thermal units (mmbtu) after 2005 – and as high as $12 per mmbtu in 2008 – shale operators had every incentive to borrow money and drill for gas. By late 2009, shale gas was so successful that gas prices were falling and the...