I.
Introduction
The economic policy in India can often
be dictated by political expediency as political parties indulge in competitive populism in the face of
improvements in social indicators such as
literacy, infant mortality and the like lagging behind rises in the rate of
economic growth.
II.
The Record
of Economic Growth
in India
By all accounts from the 15th
to the 18th century India was one of the most prosperous regions of the world with plentiful supply of highly
advanced commercial and industrial techniques
(Clydesdale 2007). From 1700, however, Indian GDP per capita started to
drop. India’s colonial experience was not unique since most colonies that did
not result in settlements had poor
records of economic growth, even stagnation Table
shows levels of GDP per capita in the major European colonial powers and some colonies for about 500 years.
Levels of GDP per
capita in European Colonial Powers and Former Colonies, 1500– 1998
(1990 international dollars)
|
1500 |
1700 |
1820 |
1913 |
1950 |
1998 |
|
European Colonial Powers |
|||||
Britain |
762 |
1405 |
2121 |
5150 |
6907 |
18714 |
France |
727 |
986 |
1230 |
3485 |
5270 |
19558 |
Italy |
1100 |
1100 |
1117 |
2564 |
3502 |
17759 |
Netherlands |
754 |
2110 |
1821 |
4049 |
5996 |
20224 |
Portugal |
632 |
854 |
963 |
1244 |
2069 |
12929 |
Spain |
698 |
900 |
1063 |
2255 |
2397 |
14227 |
|
Former Colonies |
|||||
China |
600 |
600 |
600 |
552 |
439 |
3117 |
India |
550 |
550 |
533 |
673 |
619 |
1746 |
Indonesia |
565 |
580 |
612 |
904 |
840 |
3070 |
Brazil |
400 |
460 |
646 |
811 |
1672 |
5459 |
Mexico |
425 |
568 |
759 |
1732 |
2365 |
6655 |
United States |
526 |
715 |
880 |
2736 |
3446 |
18183 |
Source: Maddison (2006).
Thus the colonial experience was
impoverishing for several colonies. Currently China’s GDP per capita is higher
than India’s by a factor of almost 3 indicating that since independence India’s advantage over China has disappeared. India’s
post-independence growth did not have an auspicious
start, although growth has accelerated considerably of late.
In aggregate terms growth appears to
have picked up significantly since the 1980s.
Further, the variability of
this growth (as measured by the standard deviation) has come down significantly. Per capita GDP growth which
was 1.2 percent per annum during 1972-82, accelerated
to 3.0 percent during 1982-92 and further to 3.9 percent during 1992-2002. In recent times it has accelerated even
further. So the Indian economy has been enjoying high and relatively stable rates of growth for more than a quarter
century now.
Real GDP growth was at 9.0 per cent in 2005-06 and accelerated to 9.4 per cent in 2006-07. This comes on the back of two good years for GDP growth: 8.5 per cent in 2003-04 and 7.5 per cent in 2004-05. As a consequence of such rapid growth India is now a huge market with a large and young population. As much as 95.1 per cent of India's billion plus population is below the age of 65, with almost a third being younger than 14.
Labor force is keen to enrich itself
quickly and to compete with the outside world - witness India's persistent double-digit export growth in recent years.
Furthermore, India's growth is likely
to be less dependent on global growth than other Asian countries since it does
not rely excessively on manufacturing exports.
The service sector accounts for more than 31 per cent of India's exports.
Thus any downturn
in the global economy may
have less impact on India.
One concern attending recent economic
growth in India is that since it has been demand led and faces key infrastructural constraints, inflation has picked
up. In particular, CPI-AL (the price
index most relevant for the poor in India) has risen more rapidly than the
wholesale price index or the CPI-IW. The RBI has raised the cost of borrowing
successively to rein in inflation.
This move seems to be having the desired effect although much will depend on
the South West monsoons and the
supply situation thereafter.
Factors Accelerating Economic
Growth in India
The current high rate of economic growth
could well accelerate further as Kelkar (2004) has opined. Contributing to this acceleration is a broad series of reforms including
financial sector reforms,
increased globalization and widening and deepening of product and financial markets. At the same time a benign FDI
policy framework has permitted greater tie-ups in high technology areas for production for domestic as well as
external markets.
Productivity Growth
The higher GDP growth rate beginning in the
1980s has been accompanied by an even sharper
acceleration in total factor productivity growth. Rodrik and Subramanian (2004) examine a number of possible explanations
for this rise in productivity/growth. Such explanations
include Keynesian type demand-led expansion in the 1980s, the advent of the Green Revolution, and possible external
and internal liberalization. Such beneficial synergies were helped by the climate of deregulation and delicensing
started in the early 1990s.
Table
6 documents the acceleration in total
factor productivity growth
in India.
Table 6: Sources
of Growth in India: Aggregate
and by Major sectors (percent
per year)
Aggregate Economy |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
Contribution of |
|||
Period |
Output |
Employment |
Output
per worker |
Physical capital |
Land |
Education |
Factor productivity |
1978-04 |
5.4 |
2.0 |
3.3 |
1.3 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
1.6 |
1978-93 |
4.5 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
1.0 |
-0.1 |
0.3 |
1.1 |
1993-04 |
6.5 |
1.9 |
4.6 |
1.8 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
2.3 |
Agriculture |
|||||||
1978-04 |
2.5 |
1.1 |
1.4 |
0.4 |
-0.1 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
1978-93 |
2.7 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
0.2 |
-0.1 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
1993-04 |
2.2 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
-0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
Industry |
|||||||
1978-04 |
5.9 |
3.4 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
|
0.3 |
0.6 |
1978-93 |
5.4 |
3.3 |
2.1 |
1.4 |
|
0.4 |
0.3 |
1993-04 |
6.7 |
3.6 |
3.1 |
1.7 |
|
0.3 |
1.1 |
Services |
|||||||
1978-04 |
7.2 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
0.6 |
|
0.4 |
2.4 |
1978-93 |
5.9 |
3.8 |
2.1 |
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
1.4 |
1993-04 |
9.1 |
3.7 |
5.4 |
1.1 |
|
0.4 |
3.9 |
Source: Bosworth and Collins (2007)
Improvements in Labour Supply
Adding to the impetus for higher economic growth are certain structural changes occurring in the Indian economy – particularly on the supply side. In 2000 the proportion of the Indian population in the working age group (15-64 age bracket) was 60.9%. The UN’s Population Division has projected that this ratio will surpass the proportion of Japanese in this age group by 2012 and climb to over 66% in 30 years. At that point in time it is poised to overtake China’s population in the same age group. This is a very significant projection.
Higher Savings for Enhanced Economic Growth
Central to the growth success story has
been a steady rise in India's saving and investment rates as Table
7 indicates.
Table 7: Savings and Investment in India
Savings and Investment (Base:
1999-2000) as per cent of GDP at Current Market
Prices |
|||||||
|
1999-00 |
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2005-06 (estimated) |
Gross Domestic Savings,
of which |
24.8 |
23.4 |
23.5 |
26.4 |
29.7 |
31.1 |
32.4 |
a) Public |
-0.8 |
-1.9 |
-2.0 |
-0.6 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
2.0 |
b) Private, of which |
25.6 |
25.3 |
25.5 |
27.0 |
28.5 |
28.7 |
30.4 |
i) Household, of which |
21.1 |
21.0 |
21.8 |
22.7 |
23.8 |
21.6 |
22.3 |
Financial |
10.6 |
10.2 |
10.8 |
10.3 |
11.3 |
10.2 |
11.7 |
Physical |
10.5 |
10.8 |
10.9 |
12.4 |
12.4 |
11.4 |
10.7 |
ii) Private corporate |
4.5 |
4.3 |
3.7 |
4.2 |
4.7 |
7.1 |
8.1 |
Gross Domestic Investment, of which |
25.9 |
24.0 |
22.9 |
25.2 |
28.0 |
31.5 |
33.8 |
Public |
7.4 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.1 |
6.3 |
7.1 |
7.4 |
Private |
17.9 |
16.5 |
16.3 |
18.4 |
19.4 |
21.3 |
23.6 |
Valuables |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
Gross Fixed Capital
Formation, of which |
23.4 |
22.8 |
23.0 |
23.8 |
24.8 |
26.3 |
28.1 |
Changes in stocks |
1.9 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
2.9 |
Valuables |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
Saving – Investment |
-1.1 |
-0.6 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
-0.4 |
-1.3 |
Public |
-8.2 |
-8.8 |
-8.9 |
-6.6 |
-5.2 |
-4.7 |
-5.4 |
Private |
7.7 |
8.8 |
9.2 |
8.6 |
9.2 |
7.4 |
6.9 |
Source: Economic Survey,
Government of India, 2006-07
Table 8: India:
Key Fiscal Indicators (per cent of GDP)
Though fiscal deficits have been coming
down successive reductions have become harder to achieve. It is not
clear whether the FRBMA goal of achieving zero revenue deficit by 2009 will be achieved. In the meantime public
debt is nearly 75 per cent of GDP. External debt is low, with a large share in long term debt. Hence pressures on
the exchange rate because of high external
debt are minimal.
In addition India’s foreign exchange rate reserves
on 25 May 2007 stood at
US$204.9 billion, a substantial part of which comes from sterilization operations to keep the exchange rate competitive for exporters.
Year |
Primary Deficit |
Revenue Deficit |
Gross Fiscal
Deficit |
Outstanding Liabilities (including external liabilities at historic exchange rates) |
Centre |
||||
2002-03 |
1.1 |
4.4 |
5.9 |
63.4 |
2003-04 |
-0.03 |
3.6 |
4.5 |
62.8 |
2004-05 |
-0.04 |
2.5 |
4.0 |
63.8 |
2005-06 |
0.4 |
2.6 |
4.1 |
63.4 |
2006-07 (RE) |
0.1 |
2.0 |
3.7 |
61.5 |
2007-08 (BE) |
-0.2 |
1.5 |
3.3 |
59.2 |
States |
||||
2002-03 |
1.3 |
2.2 |
4.2 |
32.5 |
2003-04 |
1.5 |
2.2 |
4.5 |
33.4 |
2004-05 |
0.7 |
1.2 |
3.5 |
33.3 |
2005-06 |
0.1 |
0.04 |
2.4 |
32.5 |
2006-07 (RE) |
0.4 |
-0.01 |
2.6 |
30.3 |
2007-08 (BE) |
-0.02 |
-0.4 |
2.1 |
29.2 |
Combined |
||||
2002-03 |
3.1 |
6.6 |
9.6 |
80.7 |
2003-04 |
2.1 |
5.8 |
8.5 |
81.4 |
2004-05 |
1.4 |
3.7 |
7.5 |
82.4 |
2005-06 |
1.0 |
2.6 |
6.6 |
80.5 |
2006-07 (RE) |
0.7 |
2.0 |
6.2 |
77.0 |
2007-08 (BE) |
0.0 |
1.2 |
5.3 |
74.2 |
RE= Revised Estimates
BE= budget estimates
Source: Reserve Bank of India
III. India’s External Sector
Performance Another notable aspect of the recent acceleration in India’s economic growth has been its greater economic integration with the global economy. International trade reforms have proceeded rapidly in India. India is far less dependent on tariffs for government revenue but agricultural tariff reduction has not kept pace with industrial tariff liberalization.
India’s export basket is geared towards high value added items such as engineering goods (Tables 9-12).
Table 9: Growth in Exports (per cent)
Region/Country |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 (Q1) |
World |
21.2 |
14.1 |
15.5 |
18.5 |
Industrial Countries |
17.3 |
8.5 |
12.6 |
12.9 |
USA |
12.9 |
10.8 |
9.7 |
9.4 |
Germany |
21.3 |
7.3 |
15.1 |
20.8 |
Japan |
19.9 |
5.2 |
9.2 |
5.4 |
Developing Countries |
27.3 |
22.1 |
19.2 |
25.8 |
China |
35.3 |
28.4 |
27.2 |
27.8 |
India |
28.2 |
29.6 |
21.5 |
12.6 |
Korea |
31.0 |
12.0 |
14.4 |
14.6 |
Singapore |
24.6 |
15.6 |
18.4 |
9.9 |
Malaysia |
26.5 |
12.0 |
14.0 |
7.6 |
Thailand |
19.8 |
14.5 |
18.7 |
17.2 |
Source: IMF (International Financial Statistics) and RBI.
Furthermore, the Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI) regime has been further liberalized and the World Investment Report 2006 mentions
India as among the top 15 recipients of FDI with improved prospects
for the intermediate run.
IV.
Illustrations of High
Growth and Stagnation in the
Indian Economy
The broadening of the base for rapid
growth in the Indian economy from service to include industry has meant that there has been rapid growth of incomes.
Based on repeated surveys of consumer
expenditure at the household level the NCAER has suggested that real incomes
are expanding rapidly as Table 13
indicates.
Table
13: Growing Prosperity – All
India
Income Figures in Rs. 000 per annum at 2001-02
prices, households in ‘000 numbers
|
1995-96 |
2001-02 |
2005-06 |
2009-10 |
<90 |
131,176 |
135,378 |
132,249 |
114,394 |
91-200 |
28,901 |
41,262 |
53,276 |
75,304 |
201-500 |
3,881 |
9,034 |
13,183 |
22,268 |
501-1,000 |
651 |
1,712 |
3,212 |
6,173 |
1,001-2,000 |
189 |
546 |
1,122 |
2,373 |
2,001-5,000 |
63 |
201 |
454 |
1,037 |
5,001-10,000 |
11 |
40 |
103 |
255 |
10,001+ |
5 |
20 |
52 |
141 |
Source: NCAER
The projected consumption boom isn’t
just restricted to urban India. On the contrary, the NCAER survey suggests that the urban demand for some relatively
low-end products will be saturated
by the end of the decade, while rural demand picks up.
This is reflected in higher penetration
levels in rural households of almost all major items. Motorcycles are now owned by close to 8 per cent of rural
households, compared with about 2 per
cent 10 years ago. Over 25 per cent of rural households have TV sets, again
about four times as many as a decade
ago. Four per cent of rural households have refrigerators, while about 38 per cent have ceiling fans. These penetration levels too are several multiples of their magnitudes of a few years ago.
I now present some evidence of the
performance of a high growth sector, automobiles
V.
Emerging Constraints on Rapid Economic
Growth in India
Although India’s economic growth record
has been truly impressive the country does not
perform as well on a broader set of human development indicators. It improved
only marginally from 0.302 in 1981 to
0.381 in 1991 and 0.472 in 2001. India’s HDI rank in 2002 was 124th
– which was a deterioration on the
rank (of 115th) attained in the previous year. In 2003 there was further slippage and India was 127th in
the global ranking.
i) Increasing regional inequality
The aggregate economic growth narrative
presented above masks substantial spatial variations.
The regional variation in economic growth in India has remained stubbornly high despite the reforms.
Figure 4:
(ii)
Rising Unemployment
An additional emerging constraint on
rapid economic growth in India is the inability – at least so far - of the reforms to generate a
sufficient number of jobs. India has
long had problems with unemployment
and underemployment. However,
economic growth in the pre-reform period
did impact on unemployment by raising the demand for labour. The employment elasticity of output growth was high.
In addition to open unemployment there
also exists India’s persistent problem of underem- ployment. Underemployment in various segments of the labour
force is quite high. The estimates of
the 50th Round of the NSS indicate that although open unemployment
was only 2 per cent in 1993-94 on
US basis, the incidence of under-employment and unemployment taken together was as much as 10 per cent
that year.
(iii)
High Fiscal
Deficit
India’s fiscal deficit woes have been
well documented. The combined fiscal deficit of the central and state
governments has been hovering near 10
percent of GDP for quite some time now but has come down in the recent past. This figure was 9.6 percent in
2002-03, 8.5 percent in 2003-04, 8.4 per cent in 2004-05 and is estimated
to be 7.5 per cent in 2005-06.
(iv) Problems of Infrastructure
India’s record in providing high
quality, reliable and reasonably priced infrastructural services to its households and businesses has been inadequate.
There is sufficient evidence to suggest
that this state of affairs will continue for some time. Even though the
potential of the private sector to
meet India’s pressing infrastructure needs is largely untapped, and hence can be expanded considerably, there will
continue to be a major role for the public sector in providing infrastructural services, particularly in the less developed
regions/states of India.
VII.
Prospects for alleviating the constraints
on rapid economic growth
That rapid economic liberalization of
the form that took place in China beginning in the late 1970s is difficult to achieve in India is now clear. In a
democratic society tolerance for rapidly
increasing inequality and slow realization of gains of liberalization for the
poor is low.
Rapid rise in agricultural employment
must await substantial investment –
particularly in agricultural infrastructure.
Employment growth in the services sector has been impressive
but the capacity of this sector to absorb labour is limited. For purposes of employment expansion India
will have to rediscover its latent comparative
advantage in low value added manufacturing.This has been the area of
most rapid growth in China and
several Southeast Asian countries. India did not enter this club and imposed
high tariffs on these products while
at the same time producing these product domestically in “small scale industries”, many of which were granted
reservations for producing specific goods. The result has been high cost production
which is non-competitive both in the domestic and international markets.
After decades of high GDP growth China
and Southeast Asia have moved up the value chain in manufacturing
production and India could well occupy the vacated low value added manufacturing space.
The one area in which considerable progress
can be expected is telecom. Mobile telephone and associated technology has grown rapidly in India. India
has in excess of 50 million mobile
phones with a rate of growth of 2 million phones a month. Internet access has improved considerably and there are plans
to bridge the rural-urban divide in internet
connectivity by rapid
expansion of services in rural areas.
Some progress has also been achieved in
the areas of roads. There is a substantial project to build new highways – including the so-called “golden
quadrilateral” to connect the four major
cities of New Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai with six lane expressways and supplementary feeder routes.
The functioning of ports has also recorded
some improvements – partly as a result of contracting
out the operations of ports to international firms with specialised expertise
on this subject.
Thus
the prospects for effective
alleviation of the constraints facing
higher economic growth are mixed but, on balance, they appear
positive. However, India must continue to adopt a forward looking economic reforms program to work around some of
these constraints and ensure high and stable
growth can be put in place.
VIII.
Conclusions
After two decades of economic reforms
the Indian economy is at a crossroads. The reforms program has yielded considerable returns in the form of higher
and more stable growth as well as
considerable modernization of the economy. After more than two decades of impressive economic growth and some
important reforms as well as deregulation, the Indian economy is at the threshold of even higher
growth.
Comments
Post a Comment